There is still confusion and possibilities of different interpretations from different institutions with reference to equivalence of special education to general education. The equivalence for getting employment in the state government schools is being followed by some states whereas few states take special educators as resource teachers /itinerant teachers only, thereby differentiating the roles and responsibilities as ‘other’ than the regular teachers. Admission to higher education is contentious, each institute interpreting the MOU between RCI and NCTE for their convenience. Very recently, a student qualified national level entrance exam and was called for M Ed admission. On verification it was found that the student had B Ed in special education (MR) from a National Institute. The student was refused admission based on the ground that B Ed special education is not eligible for M Ed under general stream, in spite of equivalence for employment, on the argument that it is only for employment not for higher education. The same student got admission for M Ed in another institute under the same administration without any difficulty. NCTE 2014 regulation has relaxed several of the admission criteria into teacher education to widen the scope of teacher education especially at the masters level. TEIs at local levels need to strengthen policies in tune with national /state levels to bring in more collaboration
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.